Corrected upper bounds for free-cut elimination
نویسندگان
چکیده
Free-cut elimination allows cut elimination to be carried out in the presence of non-logical axioms. Formulas in a proof are anchored provided they originate in a non-logical axiom or non-logical inference. This paper corrects and strengthens earlier upper bounds on the size of free-cut elimination. The correction requires that the notion of a free-cut be modified so that a cut formula is anchored provided that all of its introductions are anchored, instead of only requiring that one of its introductions is anchored. With the correction, the originally proved size upper bounds remain unchanged. These results also apply to partial cut elimination. We also apply these bounds to elimination of cuts in propositional logic. If the non-logical inferences are closed under cut and infer only atomic formulas, then all cuts can be eliminated. This extends earlier results of Takeuti and of Negri and von Plato.
منابع مشابه
Corrected Upper Bounds for Free-Cut Elimination Preliminary Draft — Comments Appreciated
The paper corrects earlier upper bounds on the size of free-cut elimination. Free-cut elimination allows cut elimination to be carried out in the presence of non-logical axioms. The correction requires that the notion of a free-cut be modified so that a cut formula is anchored provided that all of its introductions are anchored, instead of only requiring that one of its introductions is anchore...
متن کاملRefined Complexity Analysis of Cut Elimination
In [1, 2] Zhang shows how the complexity of cut elimination depends primarily on the nesting of quantifiers in cut formulas. By studying the role of contractions in cut elimination we can refine that analysis and show how the complexity depends on a combination of contractions and quantifier nesting. With the refined analysis the upper bound on cut elimination coincides with Statman’s lower bou...
متن کاملApplications of Proof Interpretations
In this thesis, the author describes the research carried out during his PhDstudies. The results presented in this thesis have previously been published in a number of papers([38, 40, 42, 39, 41]). The subject of the author’s research is the development of general, proof-theoretic methods for the extraction of effective realizers and bounds from formal (possibly ineffective) proofs in mathemati...
متن کاملLAL Is Square: Representation and Expressiveness in Light Affine Logic
We focus on how the choice of input-output representation has a crucial impact on the expressiveness of so-called “logics of polynomial time.” Our analysis illustrates this dependence in the context of Light Affine Logic (LAL), which is both a restricted version of Linear Logic, and a primitive functional programming language with restricted sharing of arguments. By slightly relaxing representa...
متن کاملElementary Elimination of Prenex Cuts in Disjunction-free Intuitionistic Logic
The size of shortest cut-free proofs of first-order formulas in intuitionistic sequent calculus is known to be non-elementary in the worst case in terms of the size of given sequent proofs with cuts of the same formulas. In contrast to that fact, we provide an elementary bound for the size of cut-free proofs for disjunction-free intuitionistic logic for the case where the cut-formulas of the or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Theor. Comput. Sci.
دوره 412 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011